Peer Review Process

The Intellectual Asa Community Service Journal implements a peer review process. All submitted articles will be personally reviewed with a single-blind review by at least one reviewer. Their responses will help the editor (or editorial board) determine whether the article can be published (accepted), published with revision, or rejected. Returned articles must be corrected by the author. After corrections are made according to the reviewer's feedback, the author must resubmit the article for further review. To avoid plagiarism, all articles submitted to the Intellectual Asa Community Service Journal will be checked using similarity checking software. The final decision on the manuscript is made by the Editor-in-Chief.